ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Channel Modeling for Multi-Receiver Molecular Communication System by Impulsive Force in Internet of Nano Things.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When studying molecular communication (MC) systems within fluid environments of the Internet of Nano Things (IoNT), fluid resistance has a significant impact on molecular transmission characteristics. In single-input multiple-output (SIMO) scenarios with multiple receivers, the interaction between fluid effects and inter-receiver interference complicates the modeling process. To address these challenges, this paper incorporates fluid resistance into a three-dimensional SIMO model and investigates the impact of the angle between receivers and the direction of the molecular pulse-considering both azimuth and polar angles-on the number of molecules received. Additionally, the interference from other receivers on the primary receiver is analyzed, and a mathematical expression for the number of received molecules is derived. Simulation results validate the model's accuracy. The experiments show that as the distance between the interfering receiver and the transmitter increases from 0.10 m to 0.95 m, the number of molecules received by the primary receiver first rises and then falls, exhibiting a nonlinear interference pattern. Moreover, reception efficiency peaks when the receiver is positioned at a polar angle of 90° and an azimuth of 0°, with deviations from these angles leading to performance degradation. The spatial arrangement of receivers and transmitters, the number of receivers, and the initial velocity of molecules all significantly influence reception performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.