ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development of a Bicycle Road Surface Roughness and Risk Assessment Method Using Smartphone Sensor Technology.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surface roughness is a key factor influencing the safety, comfort, and overall quality of bicycle lanes, which are increasingly integrated into urban transportation systems worldwide. This study aims to assess and quantify the roughness of bicycle lanes in Sejong City, Republic of Korea, by utilizing accelerometer-based sensor technologies. Five study sections (A-E) were selected to represent a range of road surface conditions, from newly constructed roads to severely deteriorated surfaces. These sections were chosen based on bicycle traffic volume and prior reports of pavement degradation. The evaluation of road surface roughness was conducted using a smartphone-mounted accelerometer to measure the vertical, lateral, and longitudinal accelerations. The data collected were used to calculate the Bicycle Road Roughness Index (BRI) and Faulting Impact Index (FII), which provide a quantitative measure of road conditions and the impact of surface defects on cyclists. Field surveys, conducted in 2022, identified significant variation in roughness across the study sections, with values of BRI ranging from 0.2 to 0.8. Sections with a BRI greater than 0.5 were considered unsafe for cyclists. The FII showed a clear relationship between bump size and cycling speed, with higher bump sizes and faster cycling speeds leading to significantly increased impact forces on cyclists. These findings highlight the importance of using quantitative metrics to assess bicycle lane conditions and provide actionable data for maintenance planning. The results suggest that the proposed methodology could serve as a reliable tool for the evaluation and management of bicycle lane infrastructure, contributing to the improvement of cycling safety and comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.