ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Using Wearable Sensors for Sex Classification and Age Estimation from Walking Patterns.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gait refers to the walking pattern of an individual and it varies from person to person. Consequently, it can be considered to be a biometric feature, similar to the face, iris, or fingerprints, and can easily be used for human identification purposes. Person identification using gait analysis has direct applications in user authentication, visual surveillance and monitoring, and access control-to name a few. Naturally, gait analysis has attracted many researchers both from academia and industry over the past few decades. Within a small population, the accuracy of person identification could be very high; however, with the growing number of people in a given gait database, identifying a person only from gait becomes a daunting task. Hence, the focus of researchers in this field has exhibited a paradigm shift to a broader problem of sex and age prediction using different biometric parameters-with gait analysis obviously being one of them. Recent works on sex and age prediction using gait pattern obtained from the inertial sensors lacks an analysis of the features being used. In this paper, we propose a number of features inherent to gait data and analyze key features from the time-series data of accelerometer and gyroscopes for the automatic recognition of sex and the prediction of age. We have trained various traditional machine learning models and achieved the highest accuracy of 94% in sex prediction and an R2 score of 0.83 in age estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.