Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40969044›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Time Series Analysis of Muscle Deformation During Physiotherapy Using Optical Wearable Sensors.

Satoshi Shimabukuro, Tamon Miyake, Emi Tamaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Satoshi ShimabukuroFaculty of Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan.
Tamon MiyakeH2L Inc., Tokyo 106-0032, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3367-3896
Emi TamakiFaculty of Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan.

Funding

New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization JPJ012495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable devices are used to acquire and analyze biometric information. However, the lack of consensus on standardized devices and analytical methods for representing the time series data of muscle force and coordination has hindered the interpretation and comparison of such data across studies. This study aimed to compare time series data between novices and experts during physiotherapy sessions to identify differences in the degree of force and coordination. Optical wearable muscle deformation sensor arrays were used to capture muscle bulging (muscle deformation) and visualize the force levels. Two types of physiotherapy sessions were conducted in the upper and lower limbs, and the time series data of muscle deformations collected during these sessions were analyzed using visualization, autocorrelation coefficients, and cross-correlation analysis. Although differences were observed visually and in effect sizes, no statistically significant group differences remained after covariate adjustment. The results revealed differences in the magnitude of force and muscle coordination. These findings highlight measurable distinctions in muscle activation patterns and coordination strategies between novices and experts, suggesting potential applications for training and skill evaluation in physiotherapy and related domains.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalPhysical Therapy ModalitiesWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultmuscle deformationnovice and expertoptical sensorphysiotherapytime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID40969044
PMCPMC12158351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.