ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
MEP-YOLOv5s: Small-Target Detection Model for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Captured Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to complex backgrounds, significant scale variations of targets, and dense distributions of small objects in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) aerial images, traditional object detection algorithms face challenges in adapting to such scenarios. This article introduces a drone detection model, MEP-YOLOv5s, which optimizes the Backbone, Neck layer, and C3 module based on YOLOv5s, and combines effective attention mechanisms to improve the training efficiency of the model by replacing the traditional CIoU loss (Complete Intersection over Union) with MPDIoU (Minimum Point Distance-based Intersection over Union) loss. This model demonstrates an excellent performance in handling typical drone detection scenarios, especially for small and dense objects. To holistically balance the detection accuracy and inference efficiency, we propose a Comprehensive Performance Indicator (CPI), which evaluates the model performance by considering both accuracy and efficiency. Evaluations on the VisDrone2019 dataset demonstrate that MEP-YOLOv5s achieves a 3.3% improvement in precision (P), a 20.9% increase in mAP@0.5, and a 19.86% gain in the CPI (α = 0.5) compared with the baseline model. Additional experiments on the NWPU VHR-10 dataset confirm that MEP-YOLOv5s outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods, offering a robust solution for UAV-based small object detection with enhanced feature extraction and attention-driven adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.