ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Person Recognition via Gait: A Review of Covariate Impact and Challenges.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recognition of Human Gait Under Asymmetric Loading.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigating vulnerabilities of gait recognition model using latent-based perturbations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human gait identification is a biometric technique that permits recognizing an individual from a long distance focusing on numerous features such as movement, time, and clothing. This approach in particular is highly useful in video surveillance scenarios, where biometric systems allow people to be easily recognized without intruding on their privacy. In the domain of computer vision, one of the essential and most difficult tasks is tracking a person across multiple camera views, specifically, recognizing the similar person in diverse scenes. However, the accuracy of the gait identification system is significantly affected by covariate factors, such as different view angles, clothing, walking speeds, occlusion, and low-lighting conditions. Previous studies have often overlooked the influence of these factors, leaving a gap in the comprehensive understanding of gait recognition systems. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the most effective gait recognition methods, assessing their performance across various image source databases while highlighting the limitations of existing datasets. Additionally, it explores the influence of key covariate factors, such as viewing angle, clothing, and environmental conditions, on model performance. The paper also compares traditional gait recognition methods with advanced deep learning techniques, offering theoretical insights into the impact of covariates and addressing real-world application challenges. The contrasts and discussions presented provide valuable insights for developing a robust and improved gait-based identification framework for future advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.