ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Rail Profile Measurement Method Based on Polarization Fusion Imaging.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A model-based image fusion framework using discrete band-limited shearlets.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The smooth area on the rail surface causes abnormal exposure in the laser section image, resulting in measurement errors of the rail profile. To address this issue, a novel rail profile measurement technique based on polarization fusion imaging is proposed. A polarized camera is utilized to acquire the four-directional polarization component images, Stokes parameter images, linear polarization angle images, and linear polarization degree images of the rail laser section. A polarization image data fusion algorithm based on Segmented Random Sample Consensus (S-RANSAC) is designed using these images as data sources, and the optimal rail profile fitting curve is obtained. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can still obtain accurate and effective rail profile data in regions where traditional methods fail to capture profile data. Compared with the traditional method, the measurement error of the rail profile is reduced from 0.137 mm to 0.081 mm, and the measurement accuracy is improved by 40.9%. Evidently, this method avoids data loss in key areas of the rail profile caused by local underexposure, thus significantly enhancing the measurement accuracy. This method can provide a valuable reference for high-precision measurement of the rail profile under complex working conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.