ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating Robotic Walker Performance: Stability, Responsiveness, and Accuracy in User Movement Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Promotion and preservation of mobility and autonomy in old age through smart rollators-a qualitative study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work presents the experimental evaluation of a robotic walker following the full implementation of its sensor and motorization system. The aging population and increasing mobility impairments drive the need for assistive robotic technologies that enhance safe and independent movement. The main objective was to validate the device's behavior in real-use scenarios by assessing its stability, responsiveness, and accuracy in detecting user movement. Tests were carried out in straight-line walking and on paths involving directional changes, both with and without motor assistance, using a cohort of five test users. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and t-SNE dimensionality reduction techniques were applied to analyze the inertial (IMU) and proximity (TOF) sensor data, complemented by motor control monitoring through wheel Hall sensors, to explore gait patterns and system performance. Additionally, synchronized measurements between the user's and walker's inertial units and Time-of-Flight sensors allowed the evaluation of spatial alignment and motion correlation. The results provide a foundation for future system adjustment and optimization, ensuring the walker offers effective, safe, and adaptive assistance tailored to the user's needs. Findings reveal that the walker successfully distinguishes individual gait patterns and adapts its behavior accordingly, demonstrating its potential for personalized mobility support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.