ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Safety and prognostic value of left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endomyocardial Biopsy Revisited: Diagnostic Value and Expanding Roles in Cardiac Amyloidosis.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe need to perform endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathies (DCM) is debated. Here we sought to determine the extent of left ventricular collagen volume fraction (LV-CVF) in DCM patients and to evaluate it as a prognostic marker. METHODS AND
resultsIn this retrospective longitudinal study, we included 524 patients with suspected DCM who underwent left ventricular EMB (LV-EMB) as a part of their clinical work-up. LV-CVF was quantified using automated image processing of high-resolution scans of LV-EMB. Deep phenotyping was performed including assessment of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Endpoints were (i) composite endpoint of heart failure-related death, sudden cardiac death, aborted sudden cardiac death (appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, reported sustained ventricular tachycardia, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation), or cardiac transplantation, and (ii) all-cause mortality. LV-EMB was associated with 0.76% major and 2.1% minor complications. No death occurred due to EMB. LV-CVF could be reliably quantified using Bayesian classification. During a median follow-up of 43.2 months (2084 patient-years), 48 patients with LV-CVF >32% and 14 patients with LV-CVF ≤32% reached the composite endpoint (log-rank p < 0.0001). A total of 62 patients reached the endpoint all-cause mortality, from which 38 presented with LV-CVF >32% and 17 with LV-CVF ≤32% (log-rank p = 0.009). In multivariable analyses, LV-CVF and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.32-3.11) were independent predictors of unfavourable outcome.
conclusionsLeft ventricular EMB is a safe diagnostic procedure. The extent of CVF in LV-EMB provides prognostic information in patients with DCM in addition to existing measures of left ventricular ejection fraction or NT-proBNP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.