ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Multimodal Deep Learning Approach for Legal English Learning in Intelligent Educational Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Sensing of Cross-Border Trade Risks Through Declaration-to-Physical-Fact Alignment and Evidence-Grounded Question Answering.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the development of artificial intelligence and intelligent sensor technologies, traditional legal English teaching approaches have faced numerous challenges in handling multimodal inputs and complex reasoning tasks. In response to these challenges, a cross-modal legal English question-answering system based on visual and acoustic sensor inputs was proposed, integrating image, text, and speech information and adopting a unified vision-language-speech encoding mechanism coupled with dynamic attention modeling to effectively enhance learners' understanding and expressive abilities in legal contexts. The system exhibited superior performance across multiple experimental evaluations. In the assessment of question-answering accuracy, the proposed method achieved the best results across BLEU, ROUGE, Precision, Recall, and Accuracy, with an Accuracy of 0.87, Precision of 0.88, and Recall of 0.85, clearly outperforming the traditional ASR+SVM classifier, image-retrieval-based QA model, and unimodal BERT QA system. In the analysis of multimodal matching performance, the proposed method achieved optimal results in Matching Accuracy, Recall@1, Recall@5, and MRR, with a Matching Accuracy of 0.85, surpassing mainstream cross-modal models such as VisualBERT, LXMERT, and CLIP. The user study further verified the system's practical effectiveness in real teaching environments, with learners' understanding improvement reaching 0.78, expression improvement reaching 0.75, and satisfaction score reaching 0.88, significantly outperforming traditional teaching methods and unimodal systems. The experimental results fully demonstrate that the proposed cross-modal legal English question-answering system not only exhibits significant advantages in multimodal feature alignment and deep reasoning modeling but also shows substantial potential in enhancing learners' comprehensive capabilities and learning experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.