ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Gate Control Mechanisms of Autoencoders for EEG Signal Reconstruction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive and portable way to capture neurophysiological activity, which provides the basis for brain-computer interface systems and more innovative applications, from entertainment to security. However, the acquisition of EEG signals often suffers from noise contamination and even signal interruption problems due to poor contact of the electrodes, body movement, or heavy noise. Such heavily contaminated and lost signal segments are usually removed manually, which can hinder practical system deployment and application performance, especially in scenarios where continuous signals are required. In our previous work, we proposed the weighted gate layer autoencoder (WGLAE) and demonstrated its effectiveness in learning dependencies in EEG time series and encoding relationships among EEG channels. The WGLAE adopts a gate layer to encourage the AE to approximate multiple relationships simultaneously by controlling the data flow of each input variable. However, it only applies a sequential control scheme without taking into account the physical meaning of EEG channel locations. In this study, we investigate the gating mechanism for WGLAE and validate the importance of having a proper gating scheme for learning relationships between EEG channels. To this end, several gate control mechanisms are designed that embed EEG channel locations and their corresponding underlying physical meanings. The influences introduced by the proposed gate control mechanisms are examined on an open dataset with different scales and associated with various stimuli. The experimental results suggest that the gating mechanisms have varying influences on reconstructing EEG signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.