ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
From IOTA Tangle 2.0 to Rebased: A Comparative Analysis of Decentralization, Scalability, and Suitability for IoT Applications.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Access Control Development Within the Framework of an IOTA-Based Electronic Medical Record Management System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) demands scalable, secure, and feeless distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) to enable seamless machine-to-machine transactions. The IOTA DLT was developed to fulfill this vision through its feeless Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) named the Tangle, whose announced upgrade to IOTA 2.0 promised feeless microtransactions and coordinator-free (Coordicide) decentralization via a Nakamoto Consensus mechanism and a Mana anti-spam system. However, its delayed decentralization and scalability limitations hindered ecosystem growth and practical IoT adoption, leading to a new ledger architecture named IOTA Rebased. This paper critically analyzes this architectural pivot and its implications for IoT applications, contrasting the abandoned IOTA 2.0 protocol-a leaderless, feeless DAG designed for the IoT-with the adoption of a Move Virtual Machine-based, object-oriented ledger secured by a Delegated Proof-of-Stake consensus via the Mysticeti protocol in IOTA Rebased. We evaluate IOTA Rebased trade-offs: enhanced programmability and speed versus compromised IoT suitability due to fees, and explore mitigation strategies such as sponsored transactions, lightweight clients, and hierarchical tiered transaction architecture to align IOTA Rebased with IoT environments where microtransactions are prevalent. A use case analysis is provided for the integration of IOTA Rebased in IoT scenarios. This study underscores the tension between technological innovation and decentralization, offering insights for balancing scalability with the unique demands of the IoT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.