ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Estimation of 3D Ground Reaction Force and 2D Center of Pressure Using Deep Learning and Load Cells Across Various Gait Conditions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Model Artificial Intelligence Framework Integrating AI-Based Markerless Motion Capture for Dynamic Gait Prediction and Health-Status Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of Three-Dimensional Ground Reaction Forces in the Golf Swing Using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units and Biomimetic Deep Learning Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks with transfer learning for continuous ground reaction force estimation in hemiparetic gait.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- A Preliminary Mechanics-Informed Machine Learning Framework for Objective Assessment of Parkinson's Disease and Rehabilitation Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional force plate-based systems offer high measurement precision but are limited to laboratory settings, restricting their use in real-world environments. To address this, we propose a method for estimating a three-axis ground reaction force (GRF) and two-axis center of pressure (CoP) using a shoe embedded with three uniaxial load cells. The estimation was conducted under five gait conditions: straight walking, turning, uphill, downhill, and running. Data were collected from 40 healthy young adults. Four deep-learning models-Fully Connected Neural Network (FCNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Sequence-to-Sequence Long Short-Term Memory (Seq2Seq-LSTM), and Transformer-were evaluated. Among them, Seq2Seq-LSTM and CNN achieved the highest performance in predicting both GRF and CoP. However, the medio-lateral (ML) components showed lower accuracy than the vertical and anterior-posterior directions. In slope conditions, particularly for vertical GRF, relatively higher root mean-square error (RMSE) values were observed. Despite some variation across gait types, predicted values showed high agreement with measurements. Compared with previous studies, the proposed method achieved comparable or better performance with a minimal sensor setup. These findings highlight the feasibility of accurate GRF and CoP estimation in diverse gait scenarios and support the potential for real-world applications. Future work will focus on sensor optimization and broader population validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.