Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968903›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Indoor Abnormal Behavior Detection for the Elderly: A Review.

Tianxiao Gu, Min Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tianxiao GuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China.ORCID 0009-0002-8304-7914
Min TangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China.

Funding

Nantong Science and Technology Program JC2023076Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province KYCX24_3643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the increased age of the global population, the proportion of the elderly population continues to rise. The safety of the elderly living alone is becoming an increasingly prominent area of concern. They often miss timely treatment due to undetected falls or illnesses, which pose risks to their lives. In order to address this challenge, the technology of indoor abnormal behavior detection has become a research hotspot. This paper systematically reviews detection methods based on sensors, video, infrared, WIFI, radar, depth, and multimodal fusion. It analyzes the technical principles, advantages, and limitations of various methods. This paper further explores the characteristics of relevant datasets and their applicable scenarios and summarizes the challenges facing current research, including multimodal data scarcity, risk of privacy leakage, insufficient adaptability of complex environments, and human adoption of wearable devices. Finally, this paper proposes future research directions, such as combining generative models, federated learning to protect privacy, multi-sensor fusion for robustness, and abnormal behavior detection on the Internet of Things environment. This paper aims to provide a systematic reference for academic research and practical application in the field of indoor abnormal behavior detection.

Indexed as

Behavioral SymptomsWearable Electronic DevicesAgedHumansabnormal detectionfall detectionhuman activity recognitionsensorsvideo

Identifiers

PMID40968903
PMCPMC12157133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.