ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pilot Study: Step Width Estimation with Body-Worn Magnetoelectric Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pilot Study: Step Width Estimation with Body-Worn Magnetoelectric Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Step width is an important clinical motor marker for gait stability assessment. While laboratory-based systems can measure it with high accuracy, wearable solutions based on inertial measurement units do not directly provide spatial information such as distances. Therefore, we propose a magnetic estimation approach based on a pair of shank-worn magnetoelectric (ME) sensors. In this pilot study, we estimated the step width of eight healthy participants during treadmill walking and compared it to an optical motion capture (OMC) reference. In a direct comparison with OMC markers attached to the magnetic system, we achieved a high estimation accuracy in terms of the mean absolute error (MAE) for step width (≤1 cm) and step width variability (<0.1 cm). In a more general comparison with heel-mounted markers during the swing phase, the standard deviation of the error (<0.5 cm, measure for precision), the step width variability estimation MAE (<0.2 cm) and the Spearman correlation (>0.88) of individual feet were still encouraging, but the accuracy was negatively affected by a constant proxy bias (3.7 and 4.6 cm) due to the different anatomical reference points used in each method. The high accuracy of the system in the first case and the high precision in the second case underline the potential of magnetic motion tracking for gait stability assessment in wearable movement analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.