ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Calibration of Integrated Low-Cost Environmental Sensors for Urban Air Temperature Based on Machine Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Hyperparameter Optimization Methods for Low-Cost COSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI Methods in Sensor Calibration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring urban microenvironments using low-cost sensors effectively addresses the spatiotemporal limitations of conventional monitoring networks. However, their widespread adoption is hindered by concerns regarding data quality. Calibrating these sensors is crucial for enabling their large-scale deployment and increasing confidence among researchers and users. This study focuses on an internet of things (IoT) application in Wuhan, China, aiming to enhance the quality of long-term hourly air temperature data collected by low-cost sensors through on-site calibration. Multiple linear regression (MLR) and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) algorithms were employed for calibration, with leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) being used for model evaluation. Factors, such as multiple scenarios, spatial distances, and seasonal variations, were also examined for their influence on long-term data calibration. The experimental findings revealed that the LightGBM method consistently outperformed MLR. Calibration using this approach markedly improved the sensor data quality, with the R-squared (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.