ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Robustness in UDC Image Restoration Through Adversarial Purification and Fine-Tuning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel defense framework to fortify Under-Display Camera (UDC) image restoration models against adversarial attacks, a previously underexplored vulnerability in this domain. Our research initially conducts an in-depth robustness evaluation of deep-learning-based UDC image restoration models by employing several white-box and black-box attacking methods. Following the assessment, we propose a two-stage approach integrating diffusion-based adversarial purification and efficient fine-tuning, uniquely designed to eliminate perturbations while retaining restoration fidelity. For the first time, we systematically evaluate seven state-of-the-art UDC models (such as DISCNet, UFormer, etc.) under diverse attacks (PGD, C&W, etc.), revealing severe performance degradation (DISCNet's PSNR drops from 35.24 to 15.16 under C&W attack). Our framework demonstrates significant improvements: after purification and fine-tuning, DISCNet's PSNR rebounds to 32.17 under PGD attack (vs. 30.17 without defense), while UFormer achieves a 19.71 PSNR under LPIPS-guided attacks (vs. 17.38 baseline). The effectiveness of our proposed approach is validated through extensive experiments, showing marked improvements in resilience against various adversarial attacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.