Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968870›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Criterion and Construct Validity of the Pocket-Worn RISE Device to Assess Movement Behaviour in Community-Dwelling People with Stroke.

Camille F M Biemans, Laura van der Heiden, Cindy Veenhof, Olaf W Verschuren, Johanna M A Visser-Meily, Martijn F Pisters, Yvonne A W Hartman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camille F M BiemansDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CXUtrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6734-9907
Laura van der HeidenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CXUtrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-6084-5869
Cindy VeenhofDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CXUtrecht, The Netherlands.
Olaf W VerschurenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CXUtrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-5327
Johanna M A Visser-MeilyDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CXUtrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn F PistersDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CXUtrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2875-1709
Yvonne A W HartmanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CXUtrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-7564

Funding

Dutch Research Council (NWO) 023.003.136Nationaal Regieorgaan Praktijkgericht Onderzoek SIA RAAK-PRO04.09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate monitoring of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) is crucial for tailoring interventions aimed at improving movement behaviour. This study evaluated the validity of the pocket-worn RISE device for measuring movement behaviour in community-dwelling patients with stroke. Criterion validity was assessed in a laboratory setting using video recordings. Construct validity was assessed in a free-living setting using the thigh-affixed ActivPAL. In the laboratory setting (25 participants, 66 ± 11.8 years), the RISE device showed good criterion validity for SB and PA. In the free-living setting (19 participants, 73 ± 10.2 years), the RISE device showed good construct validity for SB and PA, though further improvements could enhance the accuracy of individual-level measurements of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and prolonged sedentary bouts. The mean absolute percentage error and mean percentage error were below the predefined 20% threshold for SB and PA. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for SB and PA showed good reliability, but ICC ranges for prolonged sedentary bouts and MVPA were too broad to draw firm conclusions. These findings indicate the RISE device is well-suited for measuring SB and PA in free-living conditions. With real-time feedback, app compatibility, and pocket-wear convenience, the RISE device shows potential for behavioural interventions targeting movement behaviour in stroke and other chronic conditions.

Indexed as

ExerciseStrokeWearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedMovementReproducibility of ResultsSedentary BehaviorStroke Rehabilitationaccelerometryphysical activitysedentary behaviourvaliditywearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID40968870
PMCPMC12157910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.