ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Squat Kinematics Analysis Using Vicon and Affordable Motion-Capture Solutions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercises Based on a Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Application for Upper Limb Rehabilitation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The analysis of human movement is crucial in biomechanical research and clinical practice. Quantitative movement analysis evaluates sports performance by tracking joint angles, segmental velocities, and body positions. There are high-accuracy motion-tracking systems like Vicon Motion Systems (Oxford, UK) or OptiTrack (Corvallis, OR, USA), but they are expensive, require expertise, and lack portability. This study assessed a low-cost virtual reality-based motion-tracking system with a customized eMotion data acquisition and analysis application to describe joint movements during squatting. The system, which utilizes commonly available virtual reality accessories, successfully collected kinematic data and continuous tracker trajectories. The results showed high repeatability comparable to advanced optoelectronic motion-capture systems. The eMotion system protocols exhibited low variability for most rotations, with inter-trial values ranging from 0.65° to 2.20° except for hip and knee flexion, which reached 3.09° and 4.01°. The motion-tracking technology that is part of VR headsets has great potential in supporting training and rehabilitation by enabling quantitative assessment of any activity in both the real and virtual worlds. The use of low-cost solutions can increase the potential for human motion measurements in clinical practice and biomechanical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.