ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Study on Lightweight Bridge Crack Detection Algorithm Based on YOLO11.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CLGDS: robust bridge crack detection with YOLO enhanced feature fusion and SIoU optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research on Synthetic Data Methods and Detection Models for Micro-Cracks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A lightweight YOLO11n seg framework for real time surface crack detection with segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automatic bridge crack detections: A lightweight segmentation model for UAV inspection.PloS one · 2026Article
- Research on a Road Crack Detection Method Based on YOLO11-MBC.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Lightweight Dual-Attention Network for Concrete Crack Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Crack detection in structural images using a hybrid Swin Transformer and enhanced features representation block.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bridge crack detection is a key factor in ensuring the safety and extending the lifespan of bridges. Traditional detection methods often suffer from low efficiency and insufficient accuracy. The development of computer vision has gradually made bridge crack detection methods based on deep learning to become a research hotspot. In this study, a lightweight bridge crack detection algorithm, YOLO11-Bridge Detection (YOLO11-BD), is proposed based on the optimization of the YOLO11 model. This algorithm uses an efficient multiscale conv all (EMSCA) module to enhance channel and spatial attention, thereby strengthening its ability to extract crack features. Additionally, the algorithm improves detection accuracy without increasing the model size. Furthermore, a lightweight detection head (LDH) is introduced to process feature information from different channels using efficient grouped convolutions. It reduces the model's parameters and computations whilst preserving accuracy, thereby achieving a lightweight model. Experimental results show that compared with the original YOLO11, the YOLO11-BD algorithm improves mAP50 and mAP50-95 on the bridge crack dataset by 3.1% and 4.8%, respectively, whilst significantly reducing GFLOPs by 19.05%. Its frame per second remains higher than 500, demonstrating excellent real-time detection capability and high computational efficiency. The algorithm proposed in this study provides an efficient and flexible solution for the monitoring of bridge cracks using remote sensing devices such as drones, and it has significant practical application value. Its lightweight design ensures strong cross-platform adaptability and provides reliable technical support for intelligent bridge management and maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.