Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968746›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2025

SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of heart failure: A scientific statement of the HFA and the HFAI.

Marco Metra, Daniela Tomasoni, Marianna Adamo, Offer Amir, Stefan D Anker, Antoni Bayes-Genis, Michael Boehm, Javed Butler, Ovidiu Chioncel, Gerasimos Filippatos and 16 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Lactylation in cardiac repair: Nexus and therapeutic opportunity.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Marco MetraCardiology. ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Daniela TomasoniCardiology. ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marianna AdamoCardiology. ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Offer AmirDepartment of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK) of German Heart Center Charité, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Antoni Bayes-GenisHeart Institute, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, CIBERCV, Barcelona, Spain.
Michael BoehmKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Javed ButlerBaylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Ovidiu ChioncelEmergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Prof. C.C. Iliescu', University of Medicine Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.
Gerasimos FilippatosSchool of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Finn GustafssonDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ewa A JankowskaInstitute of Heart Diseases, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Juan Carlos KaskiMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Brenda MouraCentro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde, Porto, Portugal.
Mark C PetrieSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Piotr PonikowskiInstitute of Heart Diseases, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Amina RakishevaDepartment of Cardiology, Scientific Institution of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Arsen RisticSchool of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Francois RoubillePhyMedExp, Université de Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, Cardiology Department, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Gianluigi SavareseDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Petar SeferovicSerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia.
Peter van der MeerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maurizio VolterraniDepartment of Medical Sciences, Centre for Clinical and Basic Research, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Andrew J CoatsHeart Research Institute, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia.
Vijay K ChopraDepartment of Cardiology, Medanta, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Giuseppe RosanoDepartment of Human Sciences and Promotion of Quality of Life, San Raffaele Open University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) heart failure (HF) guidelines, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and for the treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Further trials showed efficacy of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). These results prompted a broadened recommendation for the SGLT2 inhibitors dapagliflozin or empagliflozin across the whole left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) spectrum in the 2023 Focused Update of the ESC HF guidelines and in other international guidelines. In SOLOIST-WHF and EMPULSE, sotagliflozin (enrolling only patients with T2DM) and empagliflozin, respectively, were beneficial when initiated at the end or soon after an episode of decompensated HF. Based on these results and on the early appearance of their beneficial effects, the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors should start early in patients hospitalized for acute HF. Analyses after study drug withdrawal in randomized clinical trials have shown that their benefits may decline rapidly after discontinuation, and thus, persistence of treatment is advised. In EMPACT-MI, empagliflozin did not reduce the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death/HF hospitalization but reduced first/recurrent HF hospitalizations. Potential benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in further specific conditions (i.e., cardiac amyloidosis, grown-up congenital heart disease and paediatric patients with HF) have been reported in observational studies but need confirmation from prospective trials. This scientific statement summarizes current evidence regarding the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of HF.

Indexed as

CardiologyHeart FailureSocieties, MedicalSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsStroke VolumeDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsGDMTheart failurepreventionSGLT2 inhibitorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID40968746
PMCPMC12719827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.