ReviewWaste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA2026
Navigating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in organic waste streams: Sources, challenges and implications for circular economy recycling - A mini-review.
Review in Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waste management systems face considerable environmental and public health challenges as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) emerge as major contaminants. These persistent chemicals have been detected in various waste streams, including industrial effluents, municipal solid waste, and wastewater. This article aims to identify where PFAS have been detected in biogenic waste streams, their implications for waste treatment, and highlight areas where data gaps exist and measurement methods are lacking. The literature reviewed suggests that most biological treatment methods used in waste treatment are ineffective in removing PFAS, with incineration emerging as the only reliable means of degradation. Conventional treatments do not adequately remove PFAS, so they persist in most recycled organic end products and are used in agriculture, such as compost and biosolids. PFAS re-enter the cycle and potentially contaminate agricultural land, raising questions about the sustainability and safety of recycling products and materials containing PFAS. However, data on their presence in biowaste, where food contact materials (FCMs) have been identified as a major source of PFAS, remain limited or non-existent. This knowledge gap is of particular interest given the widespread use of PFAS in food packaging and cookware. These findings highlight the need for regulatory action to address the PFAS contamination. Key recommendations include: (1) the implementation of restrictions on the use of PFAS in products with high consumer contact, especially FCMs, (2) the development of closed-loop recycling systems, and (3) the adoption of standardised analytical methods for the detection of PFAS in different waste streams and environmental matrices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.