Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968467›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2025

Development and validation of Tanzania's food literacy tool for adults: implications for healthy eating behaviours.

Victoria Kariathi, Hadijah Mbwana, Constance Rybak, Safiness Msollo

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria KariathiSokoine University of Agriculturehttps://ror.org/00jdryp44, Department of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, P.O. Box 3006, Morogoro, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5004-8198
Hadijah MbwanaSokoine University of Agriculturehttps://ror.org/00jdryp44, Department of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, P.O. Box 3006, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Constance RybakDivision Urban Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Lentzeallee 55, 14195Berlin, Germany.
Safiness MsolloSokoine University of Agriculturehttps://ror.org/00jdryp44, Department of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, P.O. Box 3006, Morogoro, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to develop and validate a food literacy tool for Tanzanian adults. The Tanzanian nutrition, food and health promotion experts evaluated the initial twenty-three-question food literacy tool for its relevance to the context, where its content validity was determined. The construct validity involved the analysis of food literacy information collected in a cross-sectional study involving 709 adults (484 females and 225 males) sampled from rural and urban Tanzania. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to explore the underlying factor structure and identify the number of latent constructs. A confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modelling verified the measurement model and confirmed the theoretical model's validity and reliability. The descriptive statistics summarised the essential characteristics of the study sample. The final tool remained with fourteen questions after removing questions with low factor loadings < 0·5 and higher uniqueness above 0·60. The model achieved construct validity through convergent and discriminant validity and construct reliability through the composite reliability exceeding 0·60 and a Cronbach's

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorHealth LiteracyAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultsFoodFood literacyNutrition informationTanzaniaValidity

Identifiers

PMID40968467
PMCPMC12623124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.