Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968309›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Investigation of Psychometric Characteristics of the Spiritual Resilience Scale in Individuals with Chronic Diseases in Türkiye.

Serpil Özcan, Gülcan Bahçecioğlu Turan, Arzu Sarıalioğlu, Bahar Çiftçi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Serpil ÖzcanNursing of Faculty, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-2700
Gülcan Bahçecioğlu TuranFaculty of Health Sciences, Firat University, Elazıg, Turkey. glcnbah@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0061-9490
Arzu SarıalioğluNursing of Faculty, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3047-8008
Bahar ÇiftçiNursing of Faculty, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-3042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the legitimacy and dependability of "the Spiritual Resilience Scale" in Turkish among people who were suffering from chronic conditions.This study was conducted with 309 individuals who had chronic diseases hospitalized at X University Hospital between October and December 2023. The study data were collected face to face using the "Spiritual Resilience Scale". According to the findings, the content validity index of the scale was found to be 0.99, and the factor loads of the items ranged from 0.833 to 0.925. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.919 for the 'Spiritual Endurance' subscale, 0.892 for the 'Spiritual Enterprise' subscale, and 0.880 for the 'Redemptive Purpose' subscale, while the overall Cronbach's alpha for the entire scale was 0.932. The CFA showed that the Turkish version of the 9-item, 3-subdimensional Spiritual Resilience Scale was correct, with no changes to the original scale form. It also found that the fit index values were good.The Turkish version of "the Spiritual Resilience Scale" is a valid and reliable measurement tool for evaluating spiritual resilience in clinical practices for individuals with chronic diseases.

Indexed as

PsychometricsResilience, PsychologicalSpiritualityAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyChronic diseaseNursingReliabilitySpiritual resilienceValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.