ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Effects of a clinic-referred telemedical intervention to improve exercise uptake during chemotherapy.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe successfully implemented the American College of Sports Medicine's (ACSM's) Exercise is Medicine® (EIM) initiative in a community oncology clinic. This study evaluated the impact of the evidence-based exercise intervention, adhering to ACSM guidelines on patient outcomes.
methodsUsing a quasi-experimental research design, An experienced ACSM-certified cancer exercise trainer delivered a 12-week biweekly, online group exercise intervention to 19 patients undergoing chemotherapy. Fifteen (78.8%) completed pre/post-self-report surveys on the program's acceptability and impact, change in physical activity vital signs (PAVS), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We also assessed exercise uptake and PAVS at each clinic visit. Data were analyzed using t-tests and content analysis.
resultsOn average, participants were 60 years, female (94%), non-Latino/White (60%), had stage IV cancer (92.3%), And had been receiving chemotherapy for An average of 10 months. The intervention was acceptable (86.4% enrollment) and had excellent retention (89.5%), with moderate adherence (68%). No adverse events were reported. Reasons for lack of adherence were medical reasons and treatment side effects. Compared to baseline, participants reported non-statistically significant increased aerobic exercise and improvements in HRQOL post-intervention. Participants rated the intervention as satisfactory, acceptable, and suitable (all > 4 out of 5 on a Likert scale). In open-text comments, six (40%) of the participants appreciated being asked about PAVS at the clinic, while three (20%) did not.
conclusionsPatients undergoing chemotherapy, the majority of whom had stage IV cancer, could safely participate in an online group exercise program. Larger studies among different patient populations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40968289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.