ArticleNature medicine2025
Clinical implementation of an AI-based prediction model for decision support for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.
Article in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Pain, Fatigue, Depression, Anxiety, and Malnutrition in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Mortality Predictions Including Pre-Admission Functional Status in ICU Patients With Delirium-A Substudy of the AID-ICU Trial.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Trial
- Precision management of gastrointestinal tumor-associated osteoporosis driven by cutting-edge technologies: Current status, challenges, and future prospects.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Predicting Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors for Postoperative Complications. An Aggregate Protocol for 10 Observational Studies From the Danish TRIPLE-A Cohort of 1.2 Million Surgeries.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- User perceptions of machine learning models as decision support for colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team conferences (AID-SIM-2): a qualitative simulation study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based preoperative classification of colorectal cancer stage using systemic inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Management and Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity Using AI: A Surgical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The impact of regional block presence on large language model-based postoperative analgesia recommendations in abdominal surgery: a comparative study using real-world patient data.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- BrCaM an artificial intelligence model for surgical decision making in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reliable Radiologic Skeletal Muscle Area Assessment-A Biomarker for Cancer Cachexia Diagnosis.Cells · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- AI at the Sella Turcica: Multi-Model Large Language Model Evaluation in Pituitary Adenomas.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Beyond static risk scores: dynamic world models simulating patient-specific trajectories to inform preoperative risk mitigation strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Nutritional risk score drives postoperative morbidity in colorectal cancer: findings from a LASSO-selected multivariable model in 1013 consecutive patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer multidisciplinary decision-making: concordance, predictive support and clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- The future of lung cancer surgery lies between innovations: synergy across the perioperative ERATS pathway.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- State of clinical AI in 2026.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse outcomes after elective cancer surgery are a main contributor to decreased survival, poorer oncological outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Identifying high-risk patients and selecting interventions according to individual risk profiles in the perioperative period in cancer surgery is a challenge. Using real-world data on 18,403 patients with colorectal cancer from Danish national registries and consecutive patients from a single center, we developed, validated and implemented an artificial-intelligence-based risk prediction model in clinical practice as a decision support tool for personalized perioperative treatment. Personalized treatment pathways were designed according to the predicted risk of 1-year mortality with the intensity of interventions increasing with the predicted risk. The developed model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 in the validation set. Results from the nonrandomized before/after cohort study showed an incidence proportion of the comprehensive complication index >20 of 19.1% in the personalized treatment group versus 28.0% in the standard-of-care group, adjusted odds ratio of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.92; P = 0.02). The incidence of any medical complication was 23.7% in the personalized treatment group and 37.3% in the standard-of-care group; odds ratio of 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.76; P < 0.001). According to the short-term health economic modeling, personalized perioperative treatment was cost effective. The study demonstrates a fully scalable registry-based approach for using readily available data in an artificial-intelligence-based decision support pipeline in clinical practice. Our results indicate that this specific approach can be a cost-effective strategy to improve key surgical clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.