ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Safety and efficacy of robot-assisted bile ductoplasty and intrapancreatic bile duct resection in congenital biliary dilatation: a single-center retrospective cohort (2013-2024).
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Robot-Versus Laparoscopy-Assisted Resection of Choledochal Cysts in Infants Aged Less than 3 Months.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The rebirth of pancreas transplantation: an innovative, fully robotic, reproducible surgical technique.BMC surgery · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatolithiasis: A step forward in minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.World journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic-assisted surgery for choledochal cyst in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly being utilized for congenital biliary dilatation (CBD); however, limited data exist on its feasibility across age groups, particularly for bile ductoplasty and intrapancreatic bile duct (IPBD) resection. This was a retrospective cohort study that compared the outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic CBD surgery in 159 patients (Rob group: 57; Lap group: 102) treated between 2013 and 2024. In the Rob group, hospital stay was significantly shorter, enteral feeding was started earlier, and drain duration was reduced, especially in pediatric patients. Late complications (e.g., cholangitis) were significantly less common in the Rob group compared to the Lap group (3.5 vs. 18%). The length of residual IPBD was similar in both groups. Furthermore, robotic procedures facilitate a secure and accurate hilar bile ductoplasty, thereby contributing to favorable outcomes without anastomotic stenosis or hepatolithiasis. While these findings support the potential advantages of robot-assisted CBD surgery, the follow-up period was significantly shorter in the Rob group than in the Lap group, and thus definitive conclusions regarding long-term outcomes cannot yet be drawn. Robot-assisted surgery appears safe and is associated with faster short-term recovery; long-term comparative effectiveness requires longer follow-up and adjusted analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.