SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Survival and larynx function after upfront vs. salvage total laryngectomy: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the Laryngectomy Pathway Experience-a Mixed-Method, Patient Journey Mapping Study of Two US Health Centres.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLaryngeal cancer is a major malignancy in head and neck oncology, with total laryngectomy (TL) as a key intervention for advanced and recurrent disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare primary total laryngectomy (PTL) and salvage total laryngectomy (STL) in survival, functional outcomes, and complications.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted up to January 18, 2025. Studies comparing PTL and STL were included based on predefined eligibility criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs), with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics. Sensitivity analyses ensured result robustness.
resultsThirteen studies (2,704 patients: 913 STL, 1,791 PTL) met inclusion criteria. PTL showed significantly higher overall survival at 1 year (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.38-3.55), 2 years (OR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.40-2.71), and 3 years (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.10-2.47). STL had higher risks of pharyngocutaneous fistula (OR = 2.78; 95% CI: 1.96-3.95) and reconstructive surgery (OR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02-0.75). PTL significantly reduced swallowing difficulty (OR = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05-0.28) and hypopharyngeal stricture (OR = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.49). Speech functional outcomes showed no significant differences.
conclusionPTL improves survival and swallowing function with fewer complications, making it a preferred upfront treatment. STL remains essential for managing failures. Early identification of high-risk patients may improve clinical decision-making, optimizing survival and functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40968204What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.