Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968200›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Meta-emotional intelligence in cochlear-implanted preadolescents and adolescents.

Antonella D'Amico, Maria Nicastri, Domenico Cuda, Letizia Guerzoni, Patrizia Mancini, Alessandro Geraci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antonella D'AmicoDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 15, Palermo, 90128, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-3381
Maria NicastriDepartment of Sense Organs, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2057-2810
Domenico CudaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2437-2872
Letizia GuerzoniDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.
Patrizia ManciniDepartment of Sense Organs, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-0905
Alessandro GeraciDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 15, Palermo, 90128, Italy. alessandro.geraci@unipa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0163-5740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigates differences in meta-emotional beliefs and meta-emotional intelligence between preadolescents and adolescents with cochlear implants (CIs) and their typically hearing (TH) peers.

methodsThe sample included 86 participants aged 10-18 years, evenly divided between those with CIs and TH individuals. The IE-ACCME test, a multi-method tool, was used to assess meta-emotional intelligence. Statistical analyses were carried out to compare meta-emotional intelligence dimensions between CIs and TH groups.

resultsThe findings reveal that the CIs group had significantly higher overall meta-emotional belief scores, suggesting that individuals with CIs perceive emotions as playing a more significant role in their lives. Despite this, no significant differences were found in subscales related to emotion perception, comprehension, and management, indicating similar beliefs across both groups. However, the CIs group scored higher on the facilitation subscale, reflecting stronger beliefs about using emotions to enhance thinking. Additionally, the CIs group tended to overestimate their emotional abilities, both in everyday life and in emotional ability tests.

conclusionCIs group exhibited heightened meta-emotional beliefs and a tendency to overestimate their emotional abilities, reflecting a distinct meta-emotional intelligence profile linked to hearing loss and cochlear implantation. These findings suggest a distinct emotional profile for individuals with CIs, highlighting the need for targeted emotional and meta-emotional skills training.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessEmotional IntelligenceEmotionsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleAdolescentsCochlear implantsEmotional abilitiesMeta-emotional intelligencePreadolescents

Identifiers

PMID40968200
PMCPMC12904866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.