Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40968198›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Diagnosing idiopathic intracranial hypertension in patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea: the growing significance of neuroradiological criteria.

Hafees Abdullah Perumbally, V Rupa, Regi Kurien, Anitha Jasper, Shalini Nair, Lekha Abraham, Lalee Varghese, Lisa Mary Cherian, Ranjeetha Rachel Inja, Ranjith Moorthy and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hafees Abdullah PerumballyDepartment of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-9386
V RupaDepartment of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. rupavedantam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-0064
Regi KurienDepartment of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1857-6019
Anitha JasperDepartment of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-1706
Shalini NairDepartment of Neurointensive Care, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-5346
Lekha AbrahamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Lalee VargheseDepartment of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-7071
Lisa Mary CherianDepartment of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9025-6613
Ranjeetha Rachel InjaDepartment of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8947-8921
Ranjith MoorthyDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6679-3483
Bijesh NairDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4702-3790
Vedantam RajshekharDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-972X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo prospectively identify the prevalence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in a cohort of patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea (SCSFR) using the previously published clinico-radiological Vellore criteria for IIH.

methodsPatients diagnosed with SCSFR over a 23-month period were prospectively evaluated using clinical methods and neuroimaging. Clinical evaluation included ophthalmological examination by fundoscopy and optical coherence tomography. Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement was performed using ultrasound scanning. Neuroimaging was performed by the acquisition of heavily T2 weighted MR images of the brain and skull base. Patients were categorised into definite, probable and no IIH using the Vellore diagnostic criteria.

resultsFifty-five patients (45 (81.8%) being women) with a mean age of 43.4+/-9.3 years were recruited to the study. Besides CSF rhinorrhoea, headache was the commonest symptom (70.9%). Eleven (20%) patients had papilledema. Empty sella (Yuh et al. grade IV and V) (74.5%) was the commonest MR finding suggestive of IIH. The overall prevalence of IIH in patients with SCSFR was 85.8%. Of these, 35 (63.7%) had definite IIH, 12 (21.8%) had probable IIH and 8 (14.6%) had no IIH. Older patients were more likely to have definite IIH (mean age, 45.5 ± 9 years) than probable IIH (mean age, 39 ± 8.5 years) with an odds ratio of 1.095 (95% CI, 1.001-1.199)(p = 0.048). Among patients with definite IIH, Meckel's cave enlargement (49.1%) was more frequently seen than posterior globe flattening (21.8%).

conclusionPatients with SCSFR have a high likelihood of having IIH. We recommend the use of Vellore criteria, which is highly reliant on MR findings, to avoid under-diagnosis of IIH in these patients.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid RhinorrheaPseudotumor CerebriAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPapilledemaPrevalenceProspective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceIdiopathic intracranial hypertensionOptic nerve sheath diameterPapilledemaSpontaneous CSF rhinorrhoea

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.