ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Current prenatal counseling of congenital heart disease in trisomy 18, pediatric cardiologists' perspective: a Fetal Heart Society Research Collaborative Study.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trisomy 18 presenting with complete bilateral radial aplasia: a rare case report.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSurvival outcomes are shifting in trisomy 18 as cardiac disease is being repaired in infancy reminiscent of trisomy 21. The landscape of prenatal counseling related to cardiac disease and trisomy 18 is unknown. STUDY
designA survey was distributed to pediatric cardiologists presenting two scenarios of cardiac disease varying by genetic diagnosis: trisomy 18 vs 21. Respondents were asked if cardiac surgery would be offered and ranked the importance of various factors in decision-making.
resultSixty three percent described surgery as an option in trisomy 18 compared to 97% in trisomy 21. Genetic diagnosis was most important in trisomy 18 compared to neonatal survival in trisomy 21. Quality of life and survival to discharge were least important in trisomy 18 compared to genetic diagnosis in trisomy 21.
conclusionSignificant variability in prenatal counseling exists for trisomy 18. Indecision may be influenced by the genetic diagnosis, survival, and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.