ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2025
Role of Water in Modulating the Fe
Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A key challenge in modeling electrocatalysis with single-atom catalysts (SACs) is accurately capturing the redox behavior of transition metals across oxidation states. This is particularly true for iron, a widely used element in such systems. Iron phthalocyanine (FePc) serves as a model compound for graphene-based Fe SACs and is commonly used in reactions like the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). While FePc initially contains Fe(II), the active species under oxidative conditions is Fe(III), with an Fe(II)/Fe(III) transition occurring at intermediate potentials. Density functional theory (DFT) simulations must reflect this redox change. However, standard DFT predicts that oxidation removes an electron from the ligand, leaving the iron in the II state. This limitation arises not from DFT itself, but from an incomplete model. We show that adding at least one (preferably two) water molecules to the axial coordination sites of iron corrects this issue. The water ligands raise the energy of iron orbitals, making electron removal from the metal more favorable. This finding has two key implications: (1) the redox properties of transition metal complexes and graphene-based SACs are strongly influenced by the coordination environment, including solvent molecules; and (2) accurate description of the atomistic structure of the catalyst requires the explicit inclusion of axial water ligands, not just the in-plane ligands, to capture the true redox behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.