ArticleAsian spine journal2026
Resection of the posterior longitudinal ligament in anterior cervical decompression surgery: a retrospective study of the clinical and radiographic outcomes in Thailand.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective study. PURPOSE: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression surgery with and without resecting the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Resection of the PLL during anterior cervical decompression surgery is still a controversial topic among spine surgeons.
methodsAll patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression surgery from October 2018 to December 2023 were included in this cohort. The PLL was preserved in patients with cervical spondylosis with only axial neck pain, cervical spine injuries with an intact PLL and intervertebral disc, PLL ossification with double layer signs on magnetic resonance imaging studies, and cervical spine metastasis. Clinical outcomes were used to evaluate the visual analog scale for neck pain and a modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Radiographs were used to evaluate the device-level Cobb angle (CA), segmental CA, global CA, and sagittal vertical axis, and they were compared with postoperative measurements at 1 year.
resultsA total of 102 patients underwent surgical intervention. In 36 patients, PLL was preserved. The retractor time was shorter in the non-PLL resection group and was statistically significant (p=0.046). The non-PLL resection group had fewer complications, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.787). Both clinical and radiographic outcomes were improved after surgery, and there were no statistically significant outcome differences between the resection and non-resection groups.
conclusionsResecting the PLL in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery may prolong retractor time and could potentially result in postoperative complications. However, it does not significantly affect radiographic outcomes regarding cervical spine alignment compared to patients where the PLL was not cut.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.