Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40967951›Full record

ReviewEBioMedicine2025

Positive cerebrospinal fluid in the 2024 McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis.

Florian Deisenhammer, Harald Hegen, Georgina Arrambide, Brenda L Banwell, Tim Coetzee, Sharmilee Gnanapavan, Xavier Montalban, Hayrettin Tumani, Maria A Willrich, Mark S Freedman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florian DeisenhammerDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: florian.deisenhammer@tirol-kliniken.at.
Harald HegenDepartment of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Georgina ArrambideMultiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia and Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Brenda L BanwellDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Tim CoetzeeNational Multiple Sclerosis Society, New York, NY, USA.
Sharmilee GnanapavanBlizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Xavier MontalbanMultiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia and Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Vic/Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Spain.
Hayrettin TumaniDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Maria A WillrichMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mark S FreedmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) introduce kappa free light chains (κ-FLC) detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) which can be used interchangeably with oligoclonal IgG bands (OCB) to demonstrate intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of κ-FLC is equal to OCB on a 95% confidence level. In rare cases determination of both, κ-FLC and OCB should be considered as the concordance rate is around 90%. We recommend calculating the κ-FLC index with values of ≥6.1 performing best for diagnosing MS. Validated turbidimetric or nephelometric assays should be applied for which proficiency testing programs are available. There is some prognostic use of the κ-FLC index with higher values predicting higher disease activity. Neurofilament light (NfL) should not be used for diagnostic purposes although it might be useful for prognosis and disease monitoring. All recommendations apply to paediatric and adult relapsing as well as progressive onset MS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisBiomarkersHumansImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsNeurofilament ProteinsOligoclonal BandsPrognosisBiomarkersImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsNeurofilament ProteinsOligoclonal BandsCerebrospinal fluidCriteriaDiagnosisFree light chainsMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID40967951
PMCPMC12571584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.