Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40967777›Full record

ReviewNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025

Neuromodulation for Epilepsy.

Rei Enatsu, Aya Kanno, Nobuhiro Mikuni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rei EnatsuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Medical University.
Aya KannoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Medical University.
Nobuhiro MikuniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Medical University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with an unresectable epileptic focus, such as an undefined focus or epileptic focus within functional areas, various neuromodulation therapies, including vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and responsive neurostimulation, have been adopted as alternative treatment modalities. Vagus nerve stimulation, the earliest approved neuromodulation therapy in Japan, may be indicated irrespective of the epilepsy type and offers several advantages, including craniotomy not being required; however, its efficacy remains limited. Among deep brain stimulation targets, the anterior nucleus of the thalamus has the most established efficacy, and anterior nucleus of the thalamus-deep brain stimulation has been covered by the national health insurance system of Japan for the treatment of epilepsy since 2023. It is considered to be particularly effective for seizures originating from the limbic structures. Although it is not approved for insurance coverage in either Japan or the United States, another effective target is the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus, particularly for generalized epilepsies, including Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. While evidence is limited, deep brain stimulation targeting the hippocampus, subthalamic nucleus, pulvinar nucleus, posteromedial hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, and cerebellum has also been reported. Responsive neurostimulation, though not yet approved in Japan, records electroencephalographic activity via intracranial electrodes and delivers automatic electrical stimulation upon seizure detection. It is useful for patients with an unresectable seizure focus, that is, eloquent cortex involvement or bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. This review outlines neuromodulation therapies for epilepsy.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationEpilepsyHumansVagus Nerve Stimulationdeep brain stimulationepilepsyneuromodulationresponsive neurostimulationvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40967777
PMCPMC12682429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.