Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40967672›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025

Comparative performance of logistic regression, multilayer perceptron and decision tree models for predicting surgical pressure injuries: a retrospective cohort study.

Chia-Yen Li, Chi-Ming Chu, Chao-Wen Chen, Hung-Yen Ke, Peng-Ching Hsiao, Hsueh-Hsing Pan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chia-Yen LiQuality Management Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1464-8871
Chi-Ming ChuSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chao-Wen ChenDivision of Trauma & Critical Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hung-Yen KeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Peng-Ching HsiaoGraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hsueh-Hsing PanDepartment of Nursing, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan pshing2001@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9020-3279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSurgical pressure injuries (SPIs) are a significant patient safety risk due to prolonged immobility and tissue hypoperfusion under general anaesthesia. Existing risk assessment tools lack real-time predictive capabilities. This study developed and validated a machine-learning model for SPI prediction and clinical integration.

methodThis retrospective cohort study analysed electronic health records from 931 surgical inpatients under general anaesthesia between January 2016 and December 2021. SPI cases were identified using ICD-10 codes with 1:1 matching by medical specialty. Data preprocessing included imputation, normalisation and outlier removal. Logistic regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and decision tree (DT) models were developed and validated via cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score.

resultsSignificant SPI predictors included the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p<0.001), number of medication types (p=0.001) and body mass index (p<0.001). The MLP outperformed LR (AUC=0.707) and DT (AUC=0.717), achieving the highest AUC (0.836), accuracy (0.773), precision (0.812), recall (0.688) and F1 score (0.745). DISCUSSION: The MLP model effectively identified key SPI risk factors, outperforming LR and DT by capturing non-linear relationships. Its integration into clinical workflows may enhance perioperative risk management through early detection and targeted interventions.

conclusionMachine learning integration can improve early SPI detection and personalised prevention. The MLP model demonstrated the highest potential for real-time SPI risk stratification. Future research should validate this model across diverse surgical populations and develop scalable strategies for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Decision TreesNeural Networks, ComputerPressure UlcerAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMultilayer PerceptronsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentHospital-Patient RelationsMedical InformaticsMedical Records Department, HospitalPublic Health NursingSafety Management

Identifiers

PMID40967672
PMCPMC12458856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.