ArticleBMJ open2025
Performance evaluation and clinical application exploration of a ViT-CNN ensemble model for multiclass oral mucosal disease classification: a pilot retrospective analysis based on public datasets.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the performance of a Vision Transformer (ViT)-based deep learning model in classifying oral mucosal diseases (OMD) and to explore the value of the integrated model for clinical support.
designA pilot study that combines publicly available datasets with integrated modelling.
methodsDeveloped an EfficientNet-B0 convolutional neural network and a ViT-B16 model, and tested three integration strategies: average method, weighted method and geometric average method. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, F1 score and inference speed. Diagnostic subject performance was compared between general dentists and oral specialists to validate model efficacy.
resultsThe integrated model outperformed individual models, with the geometric average integration method achieving an accuracy of 94.32%. When used by general dentists, the diagnostic time was reduced from 241 s to 112.4 s, with an accuracy rate of 93%.
conclusionsThe ViT-enhanced integrated system can improve the classification efficiency of OMD and provide support for non-specialist doctors. However, validation with larger datasets is needed in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.