ArticleBMJ open2025
Perceptions of quality of care in oncological outpatient settings: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore and describe how healthcare professionals within the oncological outpatient setting perceive quality of care.
designA qualitative, descriptive design with a phenomenographic approach was used, with focus group discussions as the means of data collection.
settingPrimary care in oncological outpatient units in four hospitals in Sweden.
participantsThrough purposive sampling, 20 healthcare professionals entered and completed the study by participating in four focus groups, five participants in each group. Inclusion criteria were assistant nurses, nurses or physicians delivering treatment and care with radiation and/or anticancer drugs in oncological outpatient units. Excluded were healthcare professionals who had worked less than 3 months at the oncological outpatient unit.
resultsTwo descriptive categories emerged from the data: 'The professional's personal ability for good care' and 'The structural conditions for good care'. These categories consist of descriptions of quality of care being perceived as a good meeting with patients, patient participation, continuity, accessibility and care grounded in science.
conclusionsAccording to the healthcare professionals, quality of care relies on organisational structures in combination with a professional and personal interaction between the patients and the healthcare professionals. Knowledge about what healthcare professionals believe constitutes quality of care should therefore be highly valuable to policymakers and hospital management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.