Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40967638›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Bringing diagnostic home: models, challenges and enablers of home-based examinations imaging/graph services - a scoping review.

Giovana Fondato Costa, Lorena Jorge Lorenzi, Taiuani Marquine Raymundo, Helianthe Kort, Paula Costa Castro

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giovana Fondato CostaInterunit Postgraduate Programme in Bioengineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil gfondatocosta@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-663X
Lorena Jorge LorenziInterunit Postgraduate Programme in Bioengineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2378-1263
Taiuani Marquine RaymundoDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Helianthe KortBuilding Healthy Environments for Future Users, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Paula Costa CastroInterunit Postgraduate Programme in Bioengineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile diagnostic imaging services provided at home increase accessibility and convenience, particularly for older adults, people with disabilities and other vulnerable groups. These services can reduce the need for patient travel and support the routine monitoring of chronic conditions. However, current guidelines often overlook user acceptance and environmental considerations within the home setting.

objectivesTo map studies that identify the models, barriers and facilitators for performing home-based diagnostic imaging/graph according to end users.

designA scoping review was conducted following the methodological framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies that addressed mobile or portable diagnostic imaging or graph examinations conducted in the home for individuals of any age or health status were included. Studies were eligible if they reported on barriers, facilitators or user experiences. Studies that focused on wearable technologies were excluded. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: The search strategy was developed using terms related to home-based diagnostic imaging/graph, portability, home setting and user perceptions. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, The ACM Guide to Computing Literature and LILACS, without restrictions on publication date or language. Additional grey literature was identified through Google Scholar. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardised form that captured study characteristics, types of procedures, target populations and reported barriers and facilitators. Quantitative data were summarised using absolute and relative frequencies. Qualitative findings were synthesised through basic content analysis to identify and categorise recurring themes. CHARTING

methodsData were charted in tables to organise and visually map study contexts, methodological features and thematic patterns related to implementation and user experience.

resultsTwenty-six studies published between 1998 and 2023 across 15 countries were included. The diagnostic examinations included mostly polysomnography, X-ray imaging and ultrasonography. Seven categories of barriers were identified, such as physical discomfort, equipment-related challenges and procedural limitations. Seven facilitators were also reported, including perceived comfort, patient satisfaction and equipment usability.

conclusionsThis review identifies key factors affecting the delivery and user experience of mobile diagnostic imaging at home, including logistical, technical and environmental aspects. It reveals gaps in the literature and provides a basis for future research to inform more inclusive and effective public health policies and service design. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/7UV5D).

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingHome Care ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansTelemedicineDiagnostic ImagingeHealthOrganisation of health servicesPatient-Centered CareReview

Identifiers

PMID40967638
PMCPMC12458852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.