ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Mental health outcomes among U.S. healthcare workers before, during, and after the 2019 global respiratory pandemic: A population-based study.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress on Mental Health Among Peruvian Healthcare Professionals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited evidence exists on the persistence of anxiety and depression in the post-2019 global respiratory pandemic period among healthcare workers (HCWs). This study aims to assess anxiety and depression symptoms among HCWs during the pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods-and to examine moderating effects of race and/or ethnicity, nativity, and sexual orientation.
methodsThis study analyzed data from National Health Interview Survey on a nationally representative sample of adults during pre-pandemic (N = 38,109), pandemic (N = 89,693), and post-pandemic (N = 13,895) periods in 2019-2023. The sample included HCWs in the U.S., with direct patient HCW status as the primary independent variable. The primary outcomes were self-reported anxiety and depression, measured using the Washington Group on Disability Statistics Extended Set on Functioning. Weighted logistic regression models were used to assess the associations.
resultsDirect HCWs had higher odds of anxiety and depression compared to non-direct HCWs during the pandemic, but there were no significant differences between them before or after the pandemic. Non-Hispanic White (versus racial and/or ethnic minority), sexual minority (versus heterosexual), and U.S.-born (versus foreign-born) individuals had higher odds of anxiety and depression across the three pandemic phases. Nativity was the only significant moderator, with U.S.-born HCWs having higher odds of anxiety and depression compared to foreign-born HCWs during the pandemic.
conclusionsU.S.-born HCWs, non-Hispanic White individuals, and sexual minority remain at heightened risk for anxiety and depression, highlighting the need for targeted, long-term mental health interventions to support these vulnerable groups in the post-pandemic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.