ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Development of a Rapid Diagnostic Test to Distinguish between Emerging Viruses That Cause Hemorrhagic Fever.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biosecurity and Diagnosis of Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers: Strategic Considerations for Military Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viruses that cause the clinical syndrome referred to as viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) are responsible for numerous infectious disease outbreaks. High-priority emerging viruses include orthoebolaviruses, orthomarburgviruses, Lassa virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), dengue virus (DENV), and yellow fever virus (YFV). Many of these viruses cause a similar clinical presentation in infected humans and have an overlapping geographic distribution with a risk of coemergence. As such, an antigen rapid diagnostic test to distinguish between these viruses would be beneficial in low-resource settings. In this study, we developed single-plex and multiplex antigen detection lateral flow immunoassays (LFIs) to rapidly detect and distinguish between emerging viruses that can cause VHF. We evaluated two antibody-labeling methods, colloidal gold nanoparticles and cellulose nanobeads (CNBs), to determine which approach would increase assay performance and multiplexing capabilities. Assay performance was evaluated by determining their sensitivity, specificity, matrix evaluation, and stability testing. All assays were highly specific, with no crossreactivity observed for the single-plex assays. Several of the assays performed better with the CNBs, including the DENV, YFV, RVFV, and orthomarburgvirus LFIs. No matrix effect was observed with most of the assays except that serum did impact the RVFV and DENV assays. In general, the multiplex assays were less sensitive compared with their respective single-plex assay. The most successful assays were the single-plex CNB LFIs assembled into an eight-plex cartridge, which allows for rapid and simultaneous testing of antigen to seven viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.