Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40966689›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

The Health Sector Response to Gender-Based Violence and Sexual Reproductive Health Programs in the Commonwealth and Selected African Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya, Edith Phalane, Nompumelelo Zungu, Alfred Musekiwa, Lebogang Ramalepe, Kayla Bagg, Peter Nyasulu, Olive Shisana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya *South African Medical Research Council Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research Extramural Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-0432
Edith Phalane *South African Medical Research Council Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research Extramural Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6128-2337
Nompumelelo ZunguPublic Health, Societies and Belonging, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1275-2317
Alfred Musekiwa *School of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5880-3680
Lebogang Ramalepe *Vanderbijlpark Campus, COMPRES Research Entity, University of North-West, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4007-1113
Kayla BaggEvidence Based Solutions Consulting, Pty Ltd, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9142-8800
Peter NyasuluDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2757-0663
Olive Shisana *Evidence Based Solutions Consulting, Pty Ltd, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-9145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intertwining nature of gender-based violence (GBV) and violence perpetrated against women and girls (VAWG), as well as sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR), underlines the urgent need for the health sector to enhance the coordination of services to improve health outcomes. Importantly, GBV and VAWG are intricately linked to a spectrum of SRHR challenges, ranging from unintended pregnancies to severe maternal, gynecological, and mental health outcomes. Cumulative GBV had a more significant effect on abortion risk than associated variables. Recognizing the interplay between GBV, VAWG, and SRHR highlights the necessity for a comprehensive health sector response. A systematic review of the health sector response to GBV, VAWG, and SRHR will be conducted to understand the extent and array of health facility-based coordinated responses to GBV, VAWG, and SRHR; lessons learned; and successes and challenges in the Commonwealth and selected African countries.

objectiveWe aim to understand the context of GBV, VAWG, and SRHR by conducting a comprehensive review of health sector responses in different national, cultural, and socioeconomic contexts, and we aim to share best practices, experiences, and lessons learned.

methodsA mixed methods systematic review will be conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework will be applied to screen and select relevant sources guided by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review will include relevant research papers published in the last 15 years and conducted in the 24 Commonwealth and 7 selected African countries. Electronic databases to be searched will include PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, and POPline.

resultsEthics approval will be waived as the study will use data in the public domain. The project has been commissioned by the Commonwealth Secretariat (2022-2025). The database search, data screening, and data extraction process for the review will be completed by September 2025. A manuscript will be submitted to a peer-reviewed international journal by November 2025. The initial online database searches, citations of eligible studies, and Microsoft Copilot identified 38,200 studies focusing on GBV, VAWG, and SRHR interventions. To date, 60 studies have been found eligible for inclusion in the review. The majority of these studies were conducted in eastern Africa (n=34), South Africa (n=14), and Asia (n=13). Evidence generated from this review will be made available through journal publications, seminars and workshops with key stakeholders, ministries of health, and local and international conferences.

conclusionsThe study will generate evidence to inform recommendations on addressing and mitigating the effects of GBV and VAWG on SRHR outcomes and coordinated services in the health sectors of Commonwealth and selected African countries.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024520594; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024520594. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/67571.

Indexed as

Gender-Based ViolenceReproductive HealthReproductive Health ServicesSexual HealthAfricaFemaleHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancyResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicAfrican countriesCommonwealthfemale healthgender-based violencehealth rightsreproductive healthreviewsexual and reproductive health rightssexual healthsocial disparitysocial factorsocial inequalitysocial inequitysystematic reviewsystematic review protocolviolenceviolence against womenviolence against women and girlswomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID40966689
PMCPMC12491884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.