ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
PEAKQC: periodicity evaluation in single-cell ATAC-seq data for quality assessment.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SC-framework: A robust and FAIR semi-interactive environment for single-cell resolution datasets.iScience · 2026Article
- PEAKQC: periodicity evaluation in single-cell ATAC-seq data for quality assessment.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromatin organization guides gene regulatory mechanisms and has been subject of extensive research using chromatin accessibility assays. ATAC-seq is commonly applied to elucidate regulatory regions of the genome at both bulk and single-cell resolutions. However, the analysis of single-cell ATAC-seq data is particularly challenging due to issues such as data sparsity, low signal-to-noise ratios, and the lack of standardized quality control (QC) protocols. While QC based on the fragment length distribution (FLD) represents common practice for bulk analyses, an algorithmic solution that utilizes the full potential of the FLD at the single-cell level is missing. To address this limitation, we introduce the python package PEAKQC, a novel tool that provides a robust metric for identifying high-quality cells. PEAKQC quantifies the deviation of individual cells' FLD patterns from the expected distribution using a wavelet transformation-based convolution approach. Benchmarking against alternative metrics revealed favorable selection of high-quality cells, facilitating accurate downstream analysis including cell type identification and cluster separation. PEAKQC is readily installable via the Python Package Index and can be seamlessly integrated into existing single-cell analysis frameworks that utilize Python. By providing a robust and scalable solution for single-cell ATAC-seq QC, PEAKQC addresses a significant knowledge gap in the field and proposes FLD patterns as a novel standard for data quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.