ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Graph-based deep learning for integrating single-cell and bulk transcriptomic data to identify clinical cancer subtypes.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AGCLD: an adaptive graph contrastive learning method with denoising for spatial domain identification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- A new era of precision diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer: artificial intelligence-driven multimodal data integration and clinical applications.Cell death & disease · 2026Review
- Single-Cell and Spatial Omics: Methods and Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk transcriptomic data has become essential for deciphering the complex heterogeneity of cancer and identifying clinical cancer subtypes. However, the inherent challenges posed by the high dimensionality, sparsity, and noise characteristics of scRNA-seq data have significantly hindered its widespread clinical translation. To address these limitations, we introduce single-cell and bulk transcriptomic graph deep learning, a graph-based deep learning method that synergistically integrates scRNA-seq and bulk transcriptomic data to precisely identify cancer subtypes and predict clinical outcomes. scBGDL constructs sample-specific gene graphs modeling complex gene-gene interactions and cellular relationships. The architecture employs Graph Attention Networks for feature aggregation, MinCutPool layers for dimensionality reduction, and Transformer modules to capture high-order biological dependencies. Independently validated in each of 16 distinct The Cancer Genome Atlas cancer types, scBGDL significantly outperformed existing methods in prognostic accuracy (mean C-index: 0.7060 versus 0.6709 max competitor), demonstrating robustness and generalizability to diverse transcriptional architectures. To demonstrate clinical versatility, we further evaluated scBGDL in three therapeutic contexts using multicenter cohorts: lung adenocarcinoma survival prediction (n = 1099), epithelial ovarian cancer platinum-based chemotherapy response (n = 762), skin cutaneous melanoma immunotherapy outcome (n = 305). scBGDL consistently delivered robust risk stratification (log-rank P < 0.05 across cohorts), identified key driver edges, and uncovered clinically relevant biological interpretations. By enabling multimodal data integration and interpretable biological insights, scBGDL advances precision oncology for prognosis prediction, therapy optimization, and biomarker discovery. The source code for scBGDL model is available online (https://github.com/NEFLab/scBGDL).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.