ArticleAge and ageing2025
Brain-computer-interface-based intervention increases brain functional segregation in cognitively normal older adults.
Article in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI)-based cognitive training systems have shown promise in enhancing cognitive performance in cognitively normal older adults. However, the brain network changes underlying these behavioural improvements remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we investigated topological alterations in intrinsic brain functional networks following BCI-based training and their behavioural relevance in cognitively normal older adults using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and graph theoretical analysis. Compared to a non-intervention waitlist (WL) group, the intervention (INT) group did not show significant behavioural improvements. However, they exhibited positive changes in brain network organisation. Specifically, the INT group demonstrated a reduced nodal participation coefficient, indicating enhanced strength of a node's connections within its community, primarily within control and subcortical networks, as well as increased system segregation after training. Additionally, the modular organisation of the brain functional network in the INT group became more segregated and more aligned with a young adult-based partition template (quantified using the adjusted Rand index) compared to the WL group. Importantly, decreased participation coefficients, particularly in subcortical regions, were associated with language improvement, while increases in the adjusted Rand index were linked to enhancements in everyday memory function. These findings suggest that BCI-based cognitive training may contribute to maintaining brain network organisation in cognitively normal ageing by enhancing functional network segregation, potentially supporting cognitive performance. This study provides insights into the neural mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of BCI-based cognitive training for cognitively normal ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.