Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40966612›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2025

Individual differences in dopamine-related traits influence mood effects of dopamine D2-antagonist and antidepressant treatment expectations.

Li-Ching Chuang, Nick Augustat, Philipp Bierwirth, Ty Lees, Diego A Pizzagalli, Dominik Endres, Erik M Mueller

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Li-Ching ChuangDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-6738-7999
Nick AugustatDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipp BierwirthDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Ty LeesCenter for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.
Diego A PizzagalliCenter for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7772-1143
Dominik EndresDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Erik M MuellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8721-8963

Funding

Neuroimaging Studies of Reward Processing in DepressionR37MH068376 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Diego A Pizzagalli · 2016 to 2026
$7.4M
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 290878970Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 422744262NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH068376Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Marburg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh trait anhedonia and low trait extraversion have both been previously related to not only low state positive affect but also depressive disorders, disrupted reward processing, and altered mesolimbic dopaminergic signaling. Research on placebo responses suggests that treatment expectations may alter dopamine signaling, elevate positive affect, and reduce depressive symptoms in anhedonic individuals. However, it remains unclear whether such antidepressant placebo responses depend on putative low baseline dopaminergic functioning in high anhedonia and low extraversion. The present study investigates how interindividual differences in these traits influence positive affective responses under manipulation of dopamine and treatment expectations.

methodsIn a randomized, double-blind 2 × 2 design (N = 297), we administered either placebo or the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (400 mg), and manipulated treatment expectations by telling participants that they received either a mood-elevating drug or an inactive substance. Moreover, we assessed trait anhedonia and extraversion, and had participants rate their state positive affect at 6 different time points before and after treatment.

resultsTrait anhedonia and extraversion, as well as a broad trait positive affectivity factor, predicted state positive affect across time points. Importantly, the effects of sulpiride and antidepressant treatment expectations on positive affect were moderated by dopaminergic traits such that sulpiride increased state positive affect in high anhedonia but decreased it in low anhedonia. Similarly, antidepressant treatment expectations raised positive affect in low extraversion but reduced it in high extraversion.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that dopamine-related individual differences moderate the effects of both sulpiride and a placebo intervention on positive affective state. Significance Statement In one of the first pharmacological studies examining the effects of treatment expectations and dopamine on mood in a large, healthy sample, we observed that lower baseline positive affectivity was linked to stronger mood-elevating treatment responses to both a placebo and a dopamine-related drug over time. This highlights how individual differences in relevant traits can influence treatment effectiveness, offering valuable insights for tailoring personalized approaches to depression care.

Indexed as

AffectAnhedoniaAntidepressive AgentsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsExtraversion, PsychologicalIndividualitySulpirideAdolescentAdultDopamineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntidepressive AgentsDopamineDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsSulpirideanhedoniadepressive disordersdopaminepositive affecttreatment expectations

Identifiers

PMID40966612
PMCPMC13223761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.