Trial reportThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2025
Individual differences in dopamine-related traits influence mood effects of dopamine D2-antagonist and antidepressant treatment expectations.
Trial report in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh trait anhedonia and low trait extraversion have both been previously related to not only low state positive affect but also depressive disorders, disrupted reward processing, and altered mesolimbic dopaminergic signaling. Research on placebo responses suggests that treatment expectations may alter dopamine signaling, elevate positive affect, and reduce depressive symptoms in anhedonic individuals. However, it remains unclear whether such antidepressant placebo responses depend on putative low baseline dopaminergic functioning in high anhedonia and low extraversion. The present study investigates how interindividual differences in these traits influence positive affective responses under manipulation of dopamine and treatment expectations.
methodsIn a randomized, double-blind 2 × 2 design (N = 297), we administered either placebo or the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (400 mg), and manipulated treatment expectations by telling participants that they received either a mood-elevating drug or an inactive substance. Moreover, we assessed trait anhedonia and extraversion, and had participants rate their state positive affect at 6 different time points before and after treatment.
resultsTrait anhedonia and extraversion, as well as a broad trait positive affectivity factor, predicted state positive affect across time points. Importantly, the effects of sulpiride and antidepressant treatment expectations on positive affect were moderated by dopaminergic traits such that sulpiride increased state positive affect in high anhedonia but decreased it in low anhedonia. Similarly, antidepressant treatment expectations raised positive affect in low extraversion but reduced it in high extraversion.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that dopamine-related individual differences moderate the effects of both sulpiride and a placebo intervention on positive affective state. Significance Statement In one of the first pharmacological studies examining the effects of treatment expectations and dopamine on mood in a large, healthy sample, we observed that lower baseline positive affectivity was linked to stronger mood-elevating treatment responses to both a placebo and a dopamine-related drug over time. This highlights how individual differences in relevant traits can influence treatment effectiveness, offering valuable insights for tailoring personalized approaches to depression care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.