ReviewBiology of reproduction2026
DNA damage response signaling in oocytes from an oncofertility perspective†.
Review in Biology of reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The remarkable advances in cancer therapies significantly enhance the survival rates and longevity of cancer patients. Among childhood, adolescent, and young adult female cancer survivors, however, anti-cancer agents frequently cause primary ovarian insufficiency, early menopause, and infertility, primarily due to the depletion of the ovarian reserve. Oocytes, the female germ cells, exhibit a notable susceptibility to DNA damage, given that they remain in meiotic arrest at prophase I for prolonged durations, from months to years, which increases the risks of accumulating DNA damage overtime. To counteract this, a tightly controlled DNA damage response signaling ensures that only oocytes with an intact genome progress to ovulation, fertilization, and next generations. Chemotherapeutic anti-cancer agents, including doxorubicin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, along with irradiation, elicit DNA damage via various mechanisms, including DNA crosslinking, single- and double-strand DNA breaks, and oxidative stress. The genotoxic insults activate DDR in the oocytes, which detect and repair DNA damage or initiate apoptosis to eliminate impaired oocytes. Although several protein molecules such as DNA damage-sensing kinases, checkpoint kinases, p53 family transcription factors, and pro-apoptotic molecules have been discovered, the precise mechanisms of DDR in determining the fate of oocytes, particularly how they differ from those in somatic cells and cancer cells, remain poorly understood. From an oncofertility perspective, the current review analyzes the molecular mechanisms of anti-cancer agent-induced DDR in oocytes and discusses knowledge gaps and urgent future research directions for preserving the ovarian reserve, fertility, and endocrine functions of young female cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.