ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Development of a New Electronic Death Certificate and Death Management Module Integrated Into the Health Information System of a Tertiary Hospital in Mali: Implementation Report.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Death certification provides reliable epidemiological data that are essential for public health decision-making. Implementing an electronic death certificate improves data quality, accuracy, and timeliness. Recognizing its importance, we developed and integrated a mortality management module into the hospital "Le Luxembourg," enhancing mortality data collection and utilization. Objective: This implementation aimed to improve the completeness and accuracy of mortality data, accelerate the timeliness of death reporting, and facilitate the downstream use of data to inform public health planning and research. Methods: We began by analyzing the existing infrastructure and organizational setup within the hospital. Through a series of interviews, we identified the needs of all users, enabling the design of a module suited to all levels of operation. We implemented a module comprising multiple functionalities, including certificate editing, validation, storage, mortality statistics generation. It also integrates ICD-10 coding and follows the World Health Organization (WHO) model, while remaining adapted to the hospital's specific context. To ensure optimal usability, we assembled a project team that included a mortality audit committee. After implementation, all users received training and continuous direct technical support was provided. Results: We developed a new death certificate model in line with WHO recommendations. Access to the certificate is secured by a unique username and password. To improve data quality, the certification process involves several validation steps: initial recording, which can be modified when the medical section is not completed by a senior physician; pre-validation by the senior physician and final validation by the mortality audit committee. The chain of morbid events is documented using ICD-10 diagnoses. Beyond the certificate itself, the system also allows for civil registration of the death. Moreover, the module can generate statistics based on multiple criteria. This process takes place with the involvement and active engagement of all stakeholders. Conclusions: We established a unique, secure, WHO-compliant death certificate model that ensures high-quality, easily exploitable, and well-archived data. The experience of this hospital may serve as a foundation for scaling up this model to other healthcare facilities within the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.