ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Profiling BRCA1-BRCT interactions and their functional relevance at amino acid resolution.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BRCA1 (breast cancer-associated protein 1) plays a central role in homologous recombination (HR) through interactions with multiple proteins across its various domains. The C-terminal BRCT domains bind HR regulators such as ABRAXAS1, CtIP, and BRIP1, each contributing to distinct, sometimes opposing, functions. While pathogenic mutations frequently cluster within the canonical BRCT phospho-binding pocket, the broader mutational landscape and its functional consequences remain poorly understood. Here, we used a site-saturation mutagenesis library of the BRCT domains to test >4,000 single-residue variants for their ability to bind ABRAXAS1 and CtIP. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, we systematically assessed these interactions and validated key findings in mammalian cells. The resulting interaction map identified previously uncharacterized residues critical for partner binding and demonstrated their detrimental impact on HR. Importantly, we identified separation-of-function mutations that selectively disrupt individual protein interactions, enabling a more detailed analysis of each partner's contribution to HR. Functional assays suggested that disruption of CtIP binding had the most pronounced impact on HR. Furthermore, integration of our data with clinical variant data revealed a strong correlation between loss of protein binding and pathogenicity, highlighting the potential utility of our interaction map for clinical variant interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.