ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Investigating the performance of foundation models on human 3'UTR sequences.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nucleotide dependency analysis of genomic language models detects functional elements.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the representational power of pre-trained DNA language models for regulatory genomics.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Decoding biology with massively parallel reporter assays and machine learning.Genes & development · 2024Review
- Evaluating the representational power of pre-trained DNA language models for regulatory genomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foundation models, such as DNABERT and Nucleotide Transformer, have recently shaped a new direction in DNA research. Trained in an unsupervised manner on a vast quantity of genomic data, they can be used for a variety of downstream tasks, such as promoter prediction, DNA methylation prediction, gene network prediction, or functional variant prioritization. However, these models are often trained and evaluated on entire genomes, neglecting genome partitioning into different functional regions. In our study, we investigate the efficacy of various unsupervised approaches, including genome-wide and 3' untranslated region (3'UTR)-specific foundation models on human 3'UTR regions. To this end, we train a set of popular transformer architectures on a 3'UTR-specific dataset comprising 3 783 714 3'UTR sequences (6.6B bp) of 241 Zoonomia species. Our evaluation includes downstream tasks specific for RNA biology, such as recognition of binding motifs of RNA-binding proteins, detection of functional genetic variants, prediction of expression levels in massively parallel reporter assays, and estimation of messenger RNA half-life. Remarkably, models specifically trained on 3'UTR sequences demonstrate superior performance when compared to established genome-wide foundation models in three out of four downstream tasks. Our results underscore the importance of considering genome partitioning into distinct functional regions when training and evaluating foundation models. In addition, the proposed set of 3'UTR-specific tasks can be used for benchmarking of future models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.